Post Archive for 2009

Parashas Noach

The Midrash expounds (Bereishis Rabbah 27:1):
“And Hashem saw that the evil of man was great” (Bereishis 6:5). It is written (Koheles 2:21): “There is a man who labors with wisdom, with knowledge, and with skill.” Said R. Yudan: “Great is the power of the prophets, who compare the creation to its Creator. As it is written (Daniel 8:16): ‘And I heard a human voice in the middle of the Ulai [Stream].’” Said R. Yehudah bar Siemon: “We have another verse that is clearer than that one. As it is written (Yechezkel 1:26), ‘And on the form of the throne, above it, there was a form having an appearance like that of a man.’” … “But gives over his portion to someone who did not labor for it” (end of Koheles 2:21)—this refers to the generation of the flood. “This, too, is futility and a great evil.” [Thus (Bereishis 6:5):] “And Hashem saw that the evil of man was great within the world.”
The Maggid explains this Midrash as follows. When Shlomo HaMelech, in Koheles 2:21, speaks of man’s laboring with wisdom, knowledge, and skill, he is referring to the fact that man acts entirely out of free choice. And when the Midrash speaks of man’s being compared to his Creator, it is referring to this power of free choice. In the generation of the flood, all the creations of the world adopted deviant patterns of behavior (Sanhedrin 108a), but only man did so out of free will. The other creations were forced into deviant behavior, due to the rupture in the fabric of nature that man’s evil had produced. Hence the Torah puts all the blame on man, declaring: “The evil of man was great within the world.” The perversion among the creations of the world reflected the evil of man, for this was the root cause.
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Parashas Bereishis

The Midrash in Bereishis Rabbah 1:1 calls the Torah the blueprint of creation. The Maggid says this means that Hashem crafted the world specifically as a medium through which the Torah’s laws can operate. Take, for example, the concept of property. Among the heavenly hosts there are no property owners, except, of course, for Hashem Himself, who owns all His creations. Similarly, within the animal kingdom, there are no property owners; all the animals have equal “rights” to whatever food is available. Consistency would dictate that there be no concept of property at all. Yet, within the human realm, there is a concept of property. Why did Hashem make the world this way? He did so in order to give effect to certain Torah laws, such as the prohibition against stealing and coveting others’ property, the obligation to give charity and lend items to others who need them, and so on.
The Maggid draws an analogy to a person hiring an artisan to do some complex work in his home. The employer must prepare a work room for the artisan and equip it with the requisite tools. Similarly, in order to enable the Torah to function within the world, Hashem had to equip the world with the requisite features. Thus, the Torah dictated how the world should be set up, and hence served as the blueprint of creation.
 The Midrash in Bereishis Rabbah 1:10 relates:
For twenty-six generations the letter alef complained to Hashem, saying: “Master of the Universe! I am the first letter in the alphabet, but not not create Your world with me [rather, Hashem used the letter beis, with which Bereishis begins].” Replied Hashem: “The world and all it contains was created solely for the sake of the Torah, as it is written (Mishlei 3:19): ‘Hashem founded the world upon wisdom.’ In the future, I will be giving the Torah at Sinai, and I will begin the revelation with you, as it is written (Shemos 20:2): ‘I (anochi – beginning with an alef) am Hashem, your God.’”
The letter alef was upset over not having been the letter used to create the world. Hashem’s plan to begin the revelation at Sinai with the alef did not preclude using the alef also for the creation of the world. How, then, Hashem’s reply calm the alef down?
Hashem was telling the alef that the Torah is His primary creation, while the world is a subordinate. The sole function of the world is to serve as a medium for Torah. Hence, the alef has no reason to complain, for, in fact, Hashem gave it the true lead position. 
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Sukkos

Below are three Dubno Maggid teachings relating to Sukkos: one about the four species, one about a verse in Koheles, and one about parashas V’Zos HaBrachah. (I will not be posting next week.) Chag Sameach!
The Mitzvah of the Four Species – Insurance for a Good Year
In Vayikra Rabbah 30:3, it is written (paraphrased):
David HaMelech taught the People of Israel: “If you have fulfilled the mitzvah of lulav, which is called “pleasant” (naim) [alluding to the beauty of the four species, or to how they move when we wave them (the verb “na” means “move”), or to the beautiful praise of Hallel that we sing to Hashem while holding them], then you can be assured that you have prevailed (nitzachta) …. Thus, he wrote (Tehillim 16:11): “Pleasantness is at your right hand for eternity (netzach).” For it is written (Shmuel Alef 15:29): “The Eternal One of Israel (Netzach Yisrael)neither speaks falsely nor retracts.” Hence, Moshe exhorts the People of Israel (Vayikra 23:40): “You shall take for yourselves on the first day [the four species].”
The Maggid explains this Midrash with a parable. A poor man bought an item from a rich man at a low price, letting the seller hold onto the item until he received payment. On his way home, the poor man met one of his friends and told him the story. He then added: “I am worried, though, that the seller will change his mind.” The friend replied: “You fool! The rich man certainly will not renege. It is you who must make sure not to renege and fail to pay, for then the deal definitely will fall through.”
The message is as follows. We can surely trust Hashem’s promise to grant us blessing, for He neither speaks falsely or reneges. What we should concern ourselves with is making sure we are trustworthy in following His directives. How do we go about this? By training ourselves in mitzvah observance at the very beginning of the year, through the mitzvah of the four species (along with the other mitzvos associated with this time of the year). If we train ourselves well, we will have the Torah’s pleasant ways at our right hand perpetually thoughout the entire year. And then we can be certain that Hashem will follow through with His end of the bargain.   
Megillas Koheles
Shlomo HaMelech teaches (Koheles 2:24): “It is not good for man to eat and drink, and show his soul satisfaction in his labor. For that, too, I saw, is from the hand of God.” The Maggid notes that Shlomo repeatedly decries investing excessive exertion in worldly affairs. Shlomo advances several arguments for this view. One argument is that such exertion simply does not pay. It is a mistake for a person to think that he will reap all the fruits of his labors; in actuality, he will reap only a small fraction, and others will reap the rest. Another argument is that toiling constantly for worldly benefits leaves a person little time to enjoy them.
Then there is a third argument, which the Maggid brings out with a parable. A pauper visited a village where there were two inns. The owner of one inn was honorable and good, while the owner of the other was wicked and stingy. The pauper happened to go to the inn with the wicked owner. He asked for a bit of food. The owner replied: “If you want to indulge yourself this evening with food and drink, I will give you a job to do, and then I will arrange a meal for you in which you can eat your fill of fine food.” The pauper agreed, and he did the work the innkeeper gave him, with great exertion. When he had finished, the innkeeper told him: “Go now to the other inn. I have told the servants there to give you a fine meal.” The pauper made his way to the other inn. When he arrived, he received a cordial welcome, was served a fine meal, ate his fill, and had a very comfortable overnight stay. He imagined that all the fine treatment he had received was in compensation for the work he had done at the first inn. Later, he told his friends the story. They responded: “You have it all wrong. Had you gone to the second inn to begin with, you would have gotten the same fine treatment without doing any work. You sweated for nothing, and got your nice meal for free.”
The message of this parable is as follows. It is true that we must work for a living; indeed, Hashem decreed that we do so. Ultimately, however, everything we acquire comes from the hand of Hashem, and not from our own efforts. Hence, we ought not pat ourselves on the back in self-satisfaction over what we have acquired. Moreover, Hashem has the power to provide a person’s needs regardless of whether he works a lot or a little. Therefore, while working for a living is necessary, strenuous labor is needless and out of place.
Parashas V’zos HaBrachah
It is written (Devarim 33:2): “Hashem came from Sinai – having shone forth to them from Seir, having appeared from Mount Paran – and approached with a contingent of His holy myriads. From His right hand, He laid out for them [the Jewish People] the fiery Torah.” The Midrash remarks (Yalkut Shimoni I:951, slightly paraphrased): “When the word came out of the Holy One’s mouth, it went forth from His right, opposite the Jewish People’s left. It made a circuit around the Jewish People’s camp, …, and came back again, from the Jewish People’s right, opposite the All-Present One’s left.” The Maggid discusses the meaning of “right” and “left” here.
In general, “right” symbolizes the primary concern, while “left” symbolizes the subsidiary. Thus, in regard to the Torah, Shlomo HaMelech says (Mishlei 3:16), “Length of days is at its right; at its left, wealth and honor.” Length of days, i.e., life itself, is the primary concern, whereas wealth and honor play a supporting role, helping our lives run smoothly.
Now, when Hashem gave us the Torah, He did so for our benefit, not for His. When we do mitzvos, we are not helping Him or giving Him a gift, for He needs no help or gifts. Rather, the mitzvos are meant to bring us good. Yet, in doing mitzvos, we are supposed to focus on the goal of serving Hashem, not on what we ourselves gain through these deeds. As the Mishnah says (Avos 1:3): “Do not be like servants who serve their master for the purpose of receiving a reward, but rather be like servants who serve their master not for the purpose of receiving a reward.” Why are we supposed to take this attitude, when the mitzvos are in truth solely for our benefit? The answer is that the mitzvos yield us benefit only if, when doing them, we connect ourselves to Hashem, the ultimate source. (Indeed, the main purpose of mitzvos is to make us firmly bonded to Hashem.) We establish a connection with Hashem by focusing ourselves on serving Him.
Thus, there are two sides to Torah: what we gain, and our striving to serve Hashem. From Hashem’s standpoint, the former is primary and the latter is secondary. We, however, are supposed to view the latter as primary and the former as secondary. Hence, the benefit the Torah brings us is set at Hashem’s right and at our left, while the goal of serving Hashem is set at Hashem’s left and our right.
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Parashas Haazinu / Haftaras Shuvah

In this week’s parashah, Moshe delivers a final rebuke to the Jewish People. In the course of this rebuke, he declares, speaking in Hashem’s name (Devarim 32:21): “They have provoked Me with a non-god, angered Me with their vanities. Hence I shall provoke them with a non-people – with a vile nation I shall anger them.” In the introduction to Sefer HaMiddos, the Maggid interprets this verse with a homiletical reading of “a non-god” as “no God.” He notes that there are two types of mitzvos. One type consists of decrees from God, which would not have been formulated by man on his own. The other type consists of common-sense rules of conduct, of a kind which man has formulated on his own. This latter category includes the duty to avoid murder, lying, and stealing, to show compassion for others, to act modestly and temperately, and so on.
When God tells us that we have provoked Him with “no God” and angered Him with “vanities,” He is telling us that we have provoked Him by violating the natural standards of human behavior – the rules we ought to follow us even without His intervention – and committing inane acts unbecoming of a human being. As punishment, measure for measure, God provokes against us a non-people – a rabble lacking basic human decency.
In the haftarah, Hoshea tells us (verse 14:2): “Return, O Israel, up to (ad) Hashem, Your God.” The Maggid explains that the choice of the term ad (rather than, for example, el) bears the message that the process of repentance is a progression from the bottom up. We must begin by striving to make ourselves into menschen, committing ourselves to correct any failings in the area of basic human decency. Only after initiating a proper effort to address such basics can we turn our attention to the special laws Hashem legislated for us to make us a holy people.
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Rosh Hashanah

In Rosh Hashanah 32b, the Gemara notes that we do not say Hallel on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. The Gemara describes the angels asking Hashem why the Jewish People do not sing praise to Him on these yomim tovim. Hashem answers: “Is it possible, when the King is sitting on the throne of judgment, … for the Jewish People to sing praise?” The Maggid discusses the thinking behind the angels’ question and Hashem’s answer.
To explain the angels’ position, the Maggid quotes the teaching (Yerushalmi Rosh Hashanah) that when a person appears before a mortal judge, he comes dressed in black clothes and disheveled, but when we appear before Hashem on Rosh Hashanah, we come in dressed in white and well groomed. The Maggid interprets this teaching in terms of a key difference between the way a mortal judges and the way Hashem judges. When a person appears before a mortal judge, he cannot be sure of the outcome, even if his case is strong, for a mortal judge is swayed by subjective factors. If the judge likes the person before him, he will issue a favorable judgment; if he dislikes him, he will issue a harsh judgment. Hashem’s judgment, by contrast, is completely just – in His righteousness, He gives us exactly what we deserve. Thus, when we appear before Hashem, the outcome is entirely in our own hands. If we repent, set out to rectify our misdeeds, and make ourselves worthy, we can be certain that Hashem will issue us a favorable verdict.
Hashem’s judging us in this way, the Maggid says, surely calls for our appreciation. Certainly we should honor Him, and the holy day of Rosh Hashanah, by seeing to it that our appearance is respectable. Beyond that, courtesy would dictate that we should even offer a song of praise to Him to express our thanks. This is the argument behind the angels’ position.
Yet we do not say Hallel on Rosh Hashanah. Why not? Because we are filled with grief over our debt of sin. Out of respect for Hashem and His holy day, we do not display our grief openly, and we appear before Him dressed in white and well groomed. But we still feel the grief in our hearts. Hashem is aware of how we feel, and so He does not expect us to sing Him a song of praise. Hashem agrees with the angels that, in principle, He rightfully deserves the praise. But He does not require it of us, for He knows that, in our state of grief, it is not possible for us to sing. At the same time, however, it behooves us to recognize the goodness Hashem shows us in the way He judges us.
K’sivah v’chasimah tovah!
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Parashios Nitzavim – Vayeilech

In parashas Netzavim, the Torah says (Devarim 30:15-19): “See, I have set before you this day life and good, death and evil. … Choose life, so that you and your descendants may live.” The Maggid notes that the Torah does not say “choose life and good,” but rather simply “choose life.” He explains that the Torah is telling us to be cautious about praying for material benefits: we should pray simply for life, rather than approaching Hashem with a detailed list of requests. We should not pray long and hard for worldly endowments such as wealth and honor, because these endowments may not be truly good for us. Praying simply for life is a safe strategy, for life itself is always to our benefit.
When praying for material blessing, the Maggid suggests that we frame our requests broadly. Further, as the siddur puts it, we should ask Hashem to “fulfill our requests for good.” That is, we should ask Hashem to give us the things we are requesting only if He finds them truly appropriate for us and to our benefit. This is one of the lessons the Torah is teaching us in the passage we quoted. We should choose life, but with respect to good we should leave the choice in the hands of the One Who truly knows and can discern.
On the other hand, when praying for spiritual endowments, we can pour out our hearts without restraint, for spiritual endowments are always beneficial. The Torah tells us which character traits and modes of behavior are good and which are bad, and we can freely pray to Hashem to help us attain the good. In this vein, Dovid HaMelech entreats (Tehillim 25:4): “O Hashem, let me know Your ways; teach me Your paths.” Indeed, most of the entreaties in Tehillim are for spiritual aid.
Yirmiyahu teaches (Eichah 3:25): “Hashem is good to those who hope in Him, to the soul that seeks Him.” When a person asks for material blessings, Hashem will sometimes – exercising His supreme capacity to determine what is truly good – deny the request. But when a person wholeheartedly seeks to draw close to Hashem, and asks Hashem for tools that will help him do so, Hashem will always grant the request.
During the Ten Days of Repentance, we pray: “Remember us for life, O King Who desires life, and inscribe us in the Book of Life – for Your sake, O Living God.” In a homiletical reading of this plea, latter-day baalei mussar such as Rav Chaim Friedlander (Sifsei Chaim) teach that when we ask Hashem for life, we should be asking Him to grant us a life that is “for Your sake” – a life centered around seeking Hashem and serving Him. The Maggid tells us that if we approach Hashem with this stance, He will respond with boundless favor.
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Parashas Ki Savo

Parashas Ki Savo includes a long litany of curses that we will suffer if we do not serve Hashem properly. The very last curse is as follows (Devarim 28:68): “And Hashem will send you back to Egypt in boats, along the way I told you that you should never see again, and you will offer yourselves for sale there to your enemies as slaves and maidservants, but no one will buy.”
In Esther Rabbah Pesichasa 3, the Midrash points out that Hashem warned us in the Torah three times not to return to Egypt. The first two verses the Midrash quotes are as follows:
1.   Shemos 14:13: For as you see Egypt today, you will not see them ever again.
2.   Devarim 17:16: For Hashem has told you that you must not go back that way again.
The third verse the Midrash quotes is the verse from our parashah that we quoted above. But in quoting this verse, the Midrash quotes only the first part – “And Hashem will send you back to Egypt in boats” – omitting the usual “etc.” Thus, in connection with this verse, the Midrash seems to stress the warning that we could be sent back to Egypt, rather than the warning that we must not go back there. The Maggid notes this feature, and draws from it an important message.
The Maggid explains that each land has its own special attributes, and Hashem matched each nation with the land whose attributes accord with that nation’s specific character. The Land of Israel is a land uniquely conducive to spiritual pursuits. And the People of Israel is a nation particularly geared toward spirituality, as reflected in the Torah’s dictates. Thus, the Land of Israel and the People of Israel are perfectly matched to each other. But this is so only when the People of Israel are faithful to their spiritual calling. When they flout the Torah and stray from serving Hashem properly, involving themselves instead in the wayward practices of other nations, they are at odds with the land. Hashem therefore exiles them from the Land of Israel and scatters them all across the world, planting each one in the land most suited to his particular form of deviance.
The Maggid then ties this idea in with the three verses quoted in the Midrash in Esther Rabbah. In the first verse, Hashem promises us that “as you have seen Egypt today, you will not see them ever again.” In the second verse, Hashem attaches a condition to the promise: if “you will not go back on that way again.” That is, if we do not act as they do, then we will not see them again. But if we return to their wayward practices, then we will be treated accordingly: “Hashem will send you back to Egypt in boats.” For then, the land that will most suit us is not the holy Land of Israel, but rather the defiled Land of Egypt, the natural habitat for decadence.
The message for us today – especially for those of us who have the merit of living in the Land of Israel – is that we must adhere steadfastly to the Torah path, and take care to avoid adopting the lowly ways of other cultures.
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Parashas Ki Seitzei

In this week’s parashah, the Torah states (Devarim 23:10): “When you go out as a camp against your enemies, you must guard yourself from all evil.” The Maggid, in a drash on this verse, interprets it as a piece of advice for facing the judgment of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur.
The Maggid develops the point with an analogy. A person who moves into a town where he has no relatives or friends tends to fear most people in town. Usually, though, he does not fear the lowly paupers, for they have no power to do him harm. It is different, however, when he has to defend a charge against him before the assembly of all the townspeople. He then humbles himself before everyone, even the lowliest. Every person counts, no matter how lowly, for perhaps just one vote will make the difference between a judgment against him and a judment in his favor.
Similarly, in Tishrei, the month whose astrological sign is the scale, we must act with added vigilance. Generally speaking, the degree of caution a person exercises to avoid a particular sin is proportionate to the severity of that sin. But in Tishrei, we go out to defend ourselves against our enemies – the heavenly accuser and his retinue – and our good deeds and bad deeds are weighed against each other. Just one minor transgression might tip the balance to the side of guilt. As Tehillim 49:6 hints, if we let our heels trample over “small matters,” we will have cause to feel fear in such a time of danger. At this time, therefore, we must guard ourselves from all evil.
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Parashas Shoftim

The second reading in this week’s parashah involves the laws of the Jewish king. The Maggid discusses the role of the king in Jewish society. He notes that in the respective blessings we recite upon seeing a Jewish king and upon seeing a gentile king (Berachos 58a), there is a key difference in phrasing. On seeing a Jewish king we make the following blessing:
Blessed are You, Hashem, our God, King of the Universe, Who has granted a share of His honor (shechalak mi-k’vodo) to those who fear Him.
On seeing a gentile king, however, the blessing we make is as follows:
Blessed are You, Lord, our God, King of the Universe, Who has given of His honor (shenasan mi-k’vodo) to mortal men.
The Maggid explains the difference in terms of the difference between the attitude expected of a Jewish king and that assumed by a typical gentile king. A Jewish king is expected to recognize that his position is not a personal asset, but simply an entrustment Hashem has conveyed to him for the purpose of establishing Torah-true law and order within Jewish society. He should make use of his sovereign powers only to promote Hashem’s honor. Hence, in the blessing upon seeing a Jewish king, the phrasing is “granted a share of His honor,” reflecting the fact that the honor a Jewish king enjoys really belongs to Hashem, and that Hashem has merely “granted a share” of this honor to him. A typical gentile king, on the other hand, regards his position as an personal asset given to him to be exploited for his personal honor and benefit – and the blessing upon seeing a gentile king reflects this fact.
In our parashah, the Torah exhorts the Jewish king to maintain the proper attitude. The Torah enjoins the king to write a Torah scroll for himself and read from it every day, “so that he will not become haughty toward his brethren, and will hold back from turning away from the commandments either to the right or to the left.” The king should regard himself as having no superiority over his brethren, except insofar as is necessary to guard the people from evil ways, and to hold them back from turning away from the commandments either to the right or to the left. He should not become haughty, and regard the kingship as given to him for his own honor.
In this vein it is written (Yeshayah 32:1): “Behold, for the sake of righteousness shall the king reign, and for the sake of justice shall the officers govern.” Likewise, David HaMelech declares (Shmuel Beis 23:2): “The spirit of Hashem spoke within me, and His word was upon my tongue. The God of Israel said – the Rock of Israel spoke to me: ‘Be a righteous ruler over man; be a ruler who instills the fear of Hashem.’” Here David HaMelech testifies that his sovereignty over the People of Israel in truth belongs to Hashem, and is not to be used to promote his own honor. Rather, it is to be used to promote Hashem’s honor, by instilling reverence for Hashem in the hearts of the people.
David Zucker, Site Administrator

Parashas Re’eh

In this week’s parashah it is written (Devarim 12:2-6):
You shall utterly destroy all the places where the nations whose land you are taking over worshipped their gods: on the high mountains and on the hills, and under every leafy tree. You shall smash their altars, break their pillars, and burn their sacred trees in the fire; you shall cut down their graven images, and you shall obliterate their name from that place.
[And] you shall not do thus to Hashem, your God. Rather, only at the place that Hashem, your God, will choose … to place His Name there shall you seek His Presence and come there. And there you shall bring your [various offerings].
The second part of this passage teaches us two things: first, that we must not erase the Name of Hashem, and, second, that we must not worship Hashem in the way that the idolaters worshipped their gods.
The Maggid elaborates on the second point. The ancient idolaters, the Maggid notes, would offer sacrifices to the heavenly bodies in order to induce them to convey blessing. They were trying to get their gods to direct themselves toward them, and they therefore built their altars on mountains and hills. The purpose of their sacrifices was to get their gods to give them something, and bringing the sacrifices on high places was meant to ease the way to this goal.
The offerings we bring Hashem, however, have a completely different purpose: they are designed to bring us closer to Hashem (as reflected in the term korban for offering, which is related to the word karov, meaning “close”). Thus, we must follow a completely different procedure in bringing offerings. We must destroy all the high places where the idolaters brought their sacrifices, so that we will not bring our offerings there. Instead, Hashem Himself will designate a place – the Beis HaMikdash – in which to concentrate His Presence, and we must go to this designated place to bring our offerings. By bringing ourselves physically into Hashem’s house, we bring ourselves spiritually closer to Him.
In addition, we must destroy the images the idolaters constructed to represent their gods. Hashem cannot be represented by an image, for His true nature is beyond human conceptualization. Moreover, a graven image is a means the idolaters used to bring their gods down to them, and thus is an illegitimate object. We must not try to bring Hashem down to us, but rather we must bring ourselves toward Him.  
David Zucker, Site Administrator